Documents in the NTIS Technical Reports collection are the results of federally funded research. They are directly submitted to or collected by NTIS from Federal agencies for permanent accessibility to industry, academia and the public.  Before purchasing from NTIS, you may want to check for free access from (1) the issuing organization's website; (2) the U.S. Government Printing Office's Federal Digital System website http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys; (3) the federal government Internet portal USA.gov; or (4) a web search conducted using a commercial search engine such as http://www.google.com.
Accession Number ADA591168
Title Enabling Early Sustainment Decisions: Application to F-35 Depot-Level Maintenance.
Publication Date 2013
Media Count 48p
Personal Author J. G. Drew P. Buryk R. G. McGarvey
Abstract This report develops an economic-based framework that can be used to make weapon system sustainment sourcing decisions as part of a sustainment enterprise posture planning process. We demonstrate the use of this framework by applying it to a new weapon system, the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, to identify depot maintenance strategies at the aircraft subsystem/technology level. To ensure that the affordability of the F-35 program is not threatened by continuing O&S cost growth, the Air Force is examining alternative strategies to reduce those costs. The Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps, through the F-35 Joint Program Office, have determined that all depot-level repairs on the F-35 will have a core component. Having a core component means that the government will maintain the capability to perform some -- but not necessarily all -- repair work at a U.S. government facility. Core decisions are made to protect the services so that, in an event of a natural disaster, war contingency, or disruption in commercial-sector operations, the government will retain the capability to perform certain tasks. Air Force Materiel Command's Depot Operations Division has suggested that approximately 60% of the total depot maintenance workload for the F-35 falls into the core category. Thus, although the U.S. government will retain the capability to perform the range of depot-level repairs, 40% of the workload -- known as 'above core' -- can be considered for sourcing to an organic Air Force facility, another military service's facility, a foreign partner, or the private sector. DoD guidance states that above-core depot workloads should be assigned on the basis of a best-value determination. But this guidance does not specify how to determine 'best value.' To help fill this gap, this report presents an approach to determining best value when assigning above-core depot workloads.
Keywords Above-core depot workload assignment
Air force facilities
Air force procurement
Air force sustainment
Aircraft maintenance
Aircraft subsystem level
Contracted services
Cost reduction
Decision making
Depot maintenance strategies
Depot-level maintenance
Depot-level repair
F-35 aircraft
Fighter aircraft
Foreign partner facilities
Joint strike fighter
Life cycle costs
Military facilities
O&s(Operating and support)
Outsourcing
Private sector facilities
Repair
Sustainment planning
Sustainment sourcing decisions
Workload


 
Source Agency Non Paid ADAS
NTIS Subject Category 51C - Aircraft
96 - Business & Economics
74E - Logistics, Military Facilities, & Supplies
Corporate Author Armed Forces Inst. of Pathology, Washington, DC. Div. of Biophysical Toxicology.
Document Type Technical report
Title Note Research rept.
NTIS Issue Number 1411
Contract Number FA7014-06-C-0001

Science and Technology Highlights

See a sampling of the latest scientific, technical and engineering information from NTIS in the NTIS Technical Reports Newsletter

Acrobat Reader Mobile    Acrobat Reader