The NTIS website and supporting ordering systems are undergoing a major upgrade from 8PM on September 25th through approximately October 6. During that time, much of the functionality, including subscription and product ordering, shipping, etc., will not be available. You may call NTIS at 1-800-553-6847 or (703) 605-6000 to place an order but you should expect delayed shipment. Please do NOT include credit card numbers in any email you might send NTIS.
Documents in the NTIS Technical Reports collection are the results of federally funded research. They are directly submitted to or collected by NTIS from Federal agencies for permanent accessibility to industry, academia and the public.  Before purchasing from NTIS, you may want to check for free access from (1) the issuing organization's website; (2) the U.S. Government Printing Office's Federal Digital System website; (3) the federal government Internet portal; or (4) a web search conducted using a commercial search engine such as
Accession Number ADA585045
Title Certification in Structural Health Monitoring Systems.
Publication Date Sep 2011
Media Count 10p
Personal Author C. M. Kabban M. M. Derriso
Abstract Despite advances in health monitoring systems, the certification process for automated SHM systems remain rooted in the probability of detection (POD). POD is a fundamental part of the certification process, however, it is not the only measure of system validity. The process to certify a system must contain measures of accuracy and reliability. Disclosing the accuracy and reliability at the time of system design allows the end user to weigh differences among various SHM system architectures. In this manner, end users may identify the architecture that meets their specific overall system requirements. Further, it creates a benchmark from which system redesigns may be assessed and compared in order to improve overall system performance. In order to determine the appropriate measures of accuracy and reliability for the SHM system, first, the necessary output of such a system must be defined. Typically, the system is built in order to identify and assess structural damage. The appearance of damage is a detection problem whereas the extent of damage (crack length and location) is an estimation problem. Thus, the proper certification of a SHM system must incorporate measures of accuracy and reliability for both the detection and estimation of structural damage. These include probabilities related to detection such as the probabilities of true and false alarms as well as positive and negative predictive values. Confidence intervals must be defined as measures of the reliability of these probability estimates. Measures for the accuracy of the location and extent of structural damage include summary measures of the estimation process or model as well as the predicted location or crack length and its associated confidence interval. Establishment of the certification process as related to SHM will lead to better quantification of system performance for both detection and estimation and ultimately better system designs. These criteria may then act as a springboard for certification in subsequent prediction of structural failure, time remaining until structural failure, and other general aspects of risk analysis related to structural health.
Keywords Damage
Npv(Negative predictive values)
Pfp(Probability of false positive)
Pod(Probability of detection)
Ppv(Positive predictive values)
Structural health monitoring

Source Agency Non Paid ADAS
NTIS Subject Category 72F - Statistical Analysis
46E - Structural Mechanics
Corporate Author Air Force Inst. of Tech., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. Dept. of Mathematics and Statistics.
Document Type Technical report
Title Note Conference paper.
NTIS Issue Number 1403
Contract Number N/A

Science and Technology Highlights

See a sampling of the latest scientific, technical and engineering information from NTIS in the NTIS Technical Reports Newsletter

Acrobat Reader Mobile    Acrobat Reader