Documents in the NTIS Technical Reports collection are the results of federally funded research. They are directly submitted to or collected by NTIS from Federal agencies for permanent accessibility to industry, academia and the public.  Before purchasing from NTIS, you may want to check for free access from (1) the issuing organization's website; (2) the U.S. Government Printing Office's Federal Digital System website; (3) the federal government Internet portal; or (4) a web search conducted using a commercial search engine such as
Accession Number ADA568388
Title Fixed-Price Development Contracts: A Historical Perspective.
Publication Date Sep 2012
Media Count 66p
Personal Author J. Lu J. S. Gansler W. Lucyshyn
Abstract The Department of Defense (DoD) continues to struggle to contain the costs of its weapons programs. In 2003, the Government Accountability Office found that the costs of major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) exceeded initial estimates by a combined total of $186 billion. By 2007, this figure increased to $302 billion, and by 2011, MDAPs exceeded their initial estimates by $402 billion. In its recent effort to reduce the costs of military acquisitions, the Obama administration mandated that the DoD increase the use of fixed-price contracts. However, the enduring problem of increasing costs suggests multiple, systemic failures occurring within the acquisition process. Unfortunately, the tendency to promote simplistic remedies over substantive reform often guides policy decisions. The DoD already spends the vast majority of its acquisition funds on fixed-price contracts for specified quantities of products, usually with good results. When it comes to major development programs, there may be a good reason that the DoD has come to rely more on cost- reimbursement (as opposed to fixed-price) contracts. This report adopts a historical perspective to analyze the effectiveness of fixed-price contracts in acquiring MDAPs. We begin with a brief survey of the different contract types employed by the DoD. Next, we examine the theoretical basis for the various contract types as well as the contexts within which they will provide the most benefit to the parties involved. We then examine three DoD aircraft acquisitions that relied on fixed-price contracts to highlight the various risks associated with fixed-price contracting: the C-5 Galaxy, the F-111 Aardvark, and the A-12 Avenger II. We also provide a brief overview of the F- 117 Nighthawk program, which used a cost-reimbursement contract during the development phase.
Keywords A-12 aircraft
A-12 avenger ii
Agency theory
Air force
Attack aircraft
Bomber aircraft
C-5 aircraft
C-5 galaxy
Case studies
Cost estimates
Cost overruns
Cost-minus-fixed-fee contracts
Cost-reimbursement contracts
Department of defense
F-111 aardvark
F-111 aircraft
F-117 aircraft
Fighter aircraft
Fixed-price contracts
Fixed-price- plus-incentive contracts
Incomplete contract theory
Lessons learned
Major defense acquisition programs
Marine corps
Military aircraft
Military procurement
Tct(Transaction cost theory)
Tpp(Total package procurement)
Transport aircraft

Source Agency Non Paid ADAS
NTIS Subject Category 51C - Aircraft
70B - Management Practice
74E - Logistics, Military Facilities, & Supplies
Corporate Author Maryland Univ., College Park. Center for Public Policy and Private Enterprise.
Document Type Technical report
Title Note Research rept.
NTIS Issue Number 1311
Contract Number N/A

Science and Technology Highlights

See a sampling of the latest scientific, technical and engineering information from NTIS in the NTIS Technical Reports Newsletter

Acrobat Reader Mobile    Acrobat Reader