|
Accession Number
|
ADA562793
|
|
Title
|
Conflict: Operational Realism versus Analytical Rigor in Defense Modeling and Simulation.
|
|
Publication Date
|
Jun 2012
|
|
Media Count
|
39p
|
|
Personal Author
|
J. D. Horton
|
|
Abstract
|
This research seeks to identify sources of conflict between operational realism requirements and analytical rigor requirements in defense Modeling and Simulation (M&S) efforts, and to provide recommendations which help alleviate identified conflicts. This research focuses on methods that can be used to improve the development and implementation of operator in the loop (OITL) virtual environments intended for use in acquisition decision making or the evaluation of operational plans. It is believed that the reduction of conflict between operators and analysts will lead to a better use of scarce M&S resources and produce better analytic results from M&S studies used as a basis for defense acquisition decision making. A real-world defense acquisition M&S case study is provided as an illustrative example from which recommendations and lessons learned are derived.
|
|
Keywords
|
Analytic rigor
Computerized simulation
Conflict
Decision making
Experimental design
M&s(Modeling and simulation)
Mathematical models
Military procurement
Oitl(Operator in the loop)
Operational realism
Requirements
Rtm(Requirements traceability matrix)
Tap(Technical assessment plan)
|
|
|
Source Agency
|
Non Paid ADAS
|
|
NTIS Subject Category
|
62B - Computer Software
94K - Laboratory & Test Facility Design & Operation
74E - Logistics, Military Facilities, & Supplies
|
|
Corporate Author
|
Air Force Inst. of Tech., Wright-Patterson AFB, OH. Graduate School of Engineering and Management.
|
|
Document Type
|
Technical report
|
|
Title Note
|
Research paper.
|
|
NTIS Issue Number
|
1225
|
|
Contract Number
|
N/A
|
